System Architecture Overview
Introduction
OmniDaemon is a universal, event-driven runtime for AI agents designed for enterprise-grade automation, scalability, and interoperability. It’s the foundational layer that turns AI intelligence into production-grade, event-driven systems.Core Architecture Principles
1. Framework-Agnostic Design
OmniDaemon works with any AI agent framework:- OmniCore Agent (MCP tools, memory routing, event streaming)
- Google ADK (Gemini, LiteLLM, session management)
- PydanticAI (Type-safe agents with Pydantic models)
- CrewAI (Role-based multi-agent collaboration)
- LangGraph (Graph-based agent workflows)
- AutoGen (Conversational multi-agent systems)
- Custom frameworks (Any Python callable)
2. Event-Driven by Design
In modern enterprises, AI agents don’t live in isolation. They need to:- Listen to events from business systems
- React to business triggers in real-time
- Collaborate across systems (CRM, ERP, data pipelines)
- Integrate with existing event architectures (Kafka, RabbitMQ, Redis)
3. Pluggable Architecture
OmniDaemon abstracts away:- ✅ Messaging (Redis Streams, Kafka, RabbitMQ, NATS)
- ✅ Persistence (Redis, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, JSON)
- ✅ Orchestration (Event routing, retries, DLQ)
System Components
Component Deep Dive
1. OmniDaemon SDK
The unified API that developers interact with. Key Methods:sdk.register_agent()- Register AI agents to listen to topicssdk.publish_task()- Publish events to trigger agentssdk.start()- Start the agent runnersdk.health()- Monitor system healthsdk.get_metrics()- Retrieve performance metrics
2. Event Bus Layer (Pluggable)
Handles all event routing, delivery, and reliability. Current Implementation:- Redis Streams (production-ready, durable, consumer groups)
- Apache Kafka (enterprise streaming)
- RabbitMQ (advanced routing)
- NATS (cloud-native, lightweight)
- AWS SQS/SNS (managed AWS services)
- Azure Service Bus (managed Azure services)
- Google Pub/Sub (managed GCP services)
- ✅ Consumer Groups - Load balancing across multiple agents
- ✅ Message Acknowledgment - Guaranteed delivery
- ✅ Stream Replay - Reprocess historical events
- ✅ Dead Letter Queue (DLQ) - Handle failed messages
- ✅ Message Reclaim - Auto-retry stalled messages
- ✅ Monitoring - Real-time event bus metrics
3. Storage Layer (Pluggable)
Handles persistence for agents, results, metrics, and configuration. Current Implementations:- Redis (fast, in-memory, production-ready)
- JSON (file-based, development/testing)
- PostgreSQL (relational, ACID transactions)
- MongoDB (document store, flexible schema)
- MySQL (relational, legacy enterprise)
- SQLite (embedded, edge deployments)
- Agents - Agent configurations and subscriptions
- Results - Task results (24-hour TTL)
- Metrics - Performance data (tasks processed, failed, latency)
- Configuration - Runtime configuration
4. Agent Runner (Core)
The runtime engine that executes AI agents. Responsibilities:- Subscribe to topics via event bus
- Consume messages from consumer groups
- Invoke callbacks (your AI agent)
- Handle errors (retries, DLQ)
- Track metrics (latency, throughput)
- Reclaim stalled messages (auto-recovery)
- ✅ Asynchronous execution (non-blocking I/O)
- ✅ Graceful shutdown (cleanup on Ctrl+C)
- ✅ Health monitoring (runtime status, uptime)
- ✅ Multi-topic support (one agent, multiple topics)
- ✅ Idempotency (correlation IDs for deduplication)
Data Flow
Event Publishing Flow
Agent Processing Flow
Failure Handling Architecture
Retry Mechanism
- ✅ Exponential backoff between retries
- ✅ Configurable retry limits
- ✅ DLQ for persistent failures
- ✅ Manual DLQ inspection and replay
Scalability Architecture
Horizontal Scaling (Multiple Runners)
- ✅ Add more runners to scale throughput
- ✅ Automatic load balancing via consumer groups
- ✅ No code changes required
- ✅ Fault tolerance (runner crash = auto-reassignment)
Vertical Scaling (Async Processing)
Each agent runner processes messages asynchronously:- Multiple messages processed concurrently
- Non-blocking I/O for API calls
- Efficient resource utilization
Deployment Architectures
1. Single Server (Development/Small Scale)
2. Multi-Server (Production)
3. Enterprise (Cloud/Hybrid)
Security Architecture
1. Authentication & Authorization
- Event Bus: Connection credentials (Redis password, Kafka SASL, etc.)
- Storage: Database authentication
- API: Optional API key authentication (future)
2. Network Security
- TLS/SSL: Encrypted connections to Redis/Kafka
- VPC/Private Networks: Isolated network segments
- Firewall Rules: Restrict access to event bus and storage
3. Data Security
- Encryption at Rest: Storage backend encryption
- Encryption in Transit: TLS for all connections
- PII Handling: GDPR/HIPAA compliance via tenant isolation
4. Multi-Tenancy
Observability Architecture
1. Metrics (sdk.get_metrics())
2. Health Monitoring (sdk.health())
3. CLI Monitoring
4. Integration with Monitoring Tools (Future)
- Prometheus - Metrics export
- Grafana - Dashboards
- DataDog - APM integration
- New Relic - Observability platform
Configuration Management
Environment-Based Configuration
Dynamic Configuration (via SDK)
Performance Characteristics
Throughput
- Redis Streams: 10,000+ messages/sec per runner
- Kafka: 100,000+ messages/sec (horizontal scaling)
- Latency: < 10ms overhead (excluding AI agent processing)
Resource Usage
- Memory: ~50-100MB per runner (excluding AI models)
- CPU: Async I/O = efficient utilization
- Network: Dependent on event bus backend
Scalability Limits
- Runners: Unlimited (horizontal scaling)
- Topics: Unlimited
- Message Size: Limited by event bus (Redis: 512MB, Kafka: 1MB default)
Technology Stack
Core Dependencies
- Python 3.10+ - Runtime language
- asyncio - Asynchronous I/O
- Pydantic - Data validation and schemas
- FastAPI - REST API (optional)
- Typer - CLI interface
- Rich - Terminal UI
Event Bus Integrations
- redis-py - Redis Streams client
- aiokafka - Kafka client (planned)
- aio-pika - RabbitMQ client (planned)
Storage Integrations
- redis-py - Redis client
- asyncpg - PostgreSQL client (planned)
- motor - MongoDB client (planned)
Design Patterns
1. Dependency Injection
OmniDaemon uses DI for event bus and storage:2. Strategy Pattern
Pluggable backends via abstract interfaces:3. Observer Pattern
Event-driven architecture at its core:Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)
ADR-001: Why Event-Driven?
Context: AI agents need to react to business events in real-time. Decision: Use event-driven architecture instead of polling or HTTP webhooks. Consequences:- ✅ Decoupling between publishers and agents
- ✅ Natural scaling via consumer groups
- ✅ Built-in reliability (retries, DLQ)
- ❌ Requires event bus infrastructure
ADR-002: Why Pluggable Backends?
Context: Enterprises have diverse infrastructure (Redis, Kafka, on-prem, cloud). Decision: Abstract event bus and storage behind interfaces. Consequences:- ✅ Works in any environment
- ✅ No vendor lock-in
- ✅ Easy migration between backends
- ❌ More complex codebase
ADR-003: Why Python?
Context: AI/ML ecosystem is primarily Python. Decision: Build OmniDaemon in Python for seamless AI framework integration. Consequences:- ✅ Easy integration with AI models
- ✅ Rich ecosystem of libraries
- ✅ Developer-friendly
- ❌ Python’s GIL (mitigated by asyncio)
Future Architecture Enhancements
Planned Features
-
Workflow Orchestration
- Multi-step agent pipelines
- Conditional routing
- Fan-out/fan-in patterns
-
Advanced Monitoring
- Prometheus metrics export
- OpenTelemetry tracing
- Custom dashboards
-
Enhanced Security
- API authentication
- RBAC for agents
- Audit logging
-
Multi-Cloud Support
- AWS SQS/SNS, Lambda
- Azure Service Bus, Functions
- GCP Pub/Sub, Cloud Run
-
Edge Deployment
- SQLite storage backend
- Local event bus (file-based)
- Offline-first agents
Related Documentation
- Event-Driven Architecture - Why event-driven AI?
- Event Bus Architecture - Event bus implementation details
- Storage Architecture - Storage layer deep dive
- Pluggable Architecture - How to swap backends
Next: Enterprise Use Cases | Deployment Guide