Skip to main content

Common Patterns

This guide provides 10 production-ready patterns for building robust event-driven AI agent systems with OmniDaemon.

Overview

Patterns Covered:
  1. Fire-and-Forget - Async tasks without waiting
  2. Request-Reply - Synchronous-like responses
  3. Agent Pipeline - Multi-stage workflows
  4. Fan-Out/Fan-In - Parallel processing
  5. Dead Letter Queue Handler - Failed message recovery
  6. Saga Pattern - Distributed transactions
  7. Multi-Tenant Routing - Customer isolation
  8. Webhook Integration - External system callbacks
  9. Event Replay - Reprocessing historical events
  10. Circuit Breaker - Fault tolerance

1. Fire-and-Forget

Use Case: Publish events without waiting for results (logging, analytics, notifications) When to Use:
  • ✅ Non-critical operations
  • ✅ Background tasks
  • ✅ High throughput requirements
  • ✅ Don’t need response
Pattern:
Agent Side:
Benefits:
  • ✅ Maximum throughput
  • ✅ No blocking
  • ✅ Simple implementation
Drawbacks:
  • ❌ No result confirmation
  • ❌ No error notification (check DLQ)

2. Request-Reply

Use Case: Publish event and wait for response (API calls, synchronous operations) When to Use:
  • ✅ Need result immediately
  • ✅ User waiting for response
  • ✅ API endpoints
  • ✅ Interactive applications
Pattern:
With Exponential Backoff:
Benefits:
  • ✅ Get result immediately
  • ✅ Error handling
  • ✅ Timeout control
Drawbacks:
  • ❌ Blocks caller
  • ❌ Polling overhead
  • ❌ Not ideal for slow tasks

3. Agent Pipeline

Use Case: Multi-stage processing (upload → scan → process → notify) When to Use:
  • ✅ Complex workflows
  • ✅ Multiple processing steps
  • ✅ Each step is independent
  • ✅ Need fault tolerance at each stage
Pattern:
Flow:
Benefits:
  • ✅ Each stage independent
  • ✅ Fault tolerance per stage
  • ✅ Easy to scale each stage
  • ✅ Traceable with correlation_id
Drawbacks:
  • ❌ More complex
  • ❌ Latency (multiple hops)
  • ❌ Harder to debug

4. Fan-Out/Fan-In

Use Case: Parallel processing then aggregation (image variants, multi-model analysis) When to Use:
  • ✅ Independent parallel tasks
  • ✅ Aggregate results
  • ✅ Performance optimization
  • ✅ Multiple agents for same data
Pattern:
With asyncio.gather (cleaner):
Benefits:
  • ✅ Parallel execution (faster)
  • ✅ Resource utilization
  • ✅ Scalable
Drawbacks:
  • ❌ Complex aggregation
  • ❌ Partial failure handling
  • ❌ Timeout management

5. Dead Letter Queue Handler

Use Case: Recover and retry failed messages (manual inspection, republishing) When to Use:
  • ✅ Messages failing systematically
  • ✅ Need manual intervention
  • ✅ Investigate failures
  • ✅ Retry after fixes
Pattern:
Automated DLQ Handler:
Benefits:
  • ✅ Recover from failures
  • ✅ Prevent data loss
  • ✅ Identify systemic issues
Drawbacks:
  • ❌ Manual intervention needed
  • ❌ Can be time-consuming

6. Saga Pattern

Use Case: Distributed transactions with compensation (order processing, reservations) When to Use:
  • ✅ Multi-step transactions
  • ✅ Need rollback capability
  • ✅ Distributed systems
  • ✅ Financial operations
Pattern:
Benefits:
  • ✅ Distributed transactions
  • ✅ Automatic rollback
  • ✅ Fault tolerance
Drawbacks:
  • ❌ Complex implementation
  • ❌ Compensation logic required
  • ❌ Eventual consistency

7. Multi-Tenant Routing

Use Case: Customer-specific processing (SaaS applications, per-tenant logic) When to Use:
  • ✅ Multi-tenant SaaS
  • ✅ Customer isolation
  • ✅ Per-customer configuration
  • ✅ Billing/usage tracking
Pattern:
Publishing with Tenant ID:
Benefits:
  • ✅ Customer isolation
  • ✅ Per-tenant limits
  • ✅ Custom configuration
  • ✅ Usage tracking

8. Webhook Integration

Use Case: Notify external systems (API callbacks, third-party integrations) When to Use:
  • ✅ External system needs results
  • ✅ Push notifications
  • ✅ Third-party integrations
  • ✅ Don’t want polling
Pattern:
With Retry:
Benefits:
  • ✅ Push notifications
  • ✅ Real-time updates
  • ✅ No polling overhead
Drawbacks:
  • ❌ Webhook endpoint must be reliable
  • ❌ Security (validate requests)
  • ❌ Network errors

9. Event Replay

Use Case: Reprocess historical events (bug fixes, new features, data migration) When to Use:
  • ✅ Fixed a bug, need to reprocess
  • ✅ New feature needs old data
  • ✅ Data migration
  • ✅ Testing
Pattern:
Benefits:
  • ✅ Fix past mistakes
  • ✅ Apply new logic to old data
  • ✅ Data recovery
Drawbacks:
  • ❌ Can be slow
  • ❌ Duplicate processing risk
  • ❌ Resource intensive

10. Circuit Breaker

Use Case: Prevent cascading failures (external API down, database overload) When to Use:
  • ✅ Call external services
  • ✅ Prevent cascading failures
  • ✅ Fast fail when service down
  • ✅ Automatic recovery
Pattern:
Benefits:
  • ✅ Prevent cascading failures
  • ✅ Fast fail when service down
  • ✅ Automatic recovery
  • ✅ System stability
Drawbacks:
  • ❌ Complexity
  • ❌ False positives possible
  • ❌ State management

Further Reading


Summary

10 Production-Ready Patterns:
  1. Fire-and-Forget - Background tasks
  2. Request-Reply - Synchronous responses
  3. Agent Pipeline - Multi-stage workflows
  4. Fan-Out/Fan-In - Parallel processing
  5. DLQ Handler - Failed message recovery
  6. Saga Pattern - Distributed transactions
  7. Multi-Tenant Routing - Customer isolation
  8. Webhook Integration - External callbacks
  9. Event Replay - Reprocess historical events
  10. Circuit Breaker - Fault tolerance
Choose Pattern Based On:
  • Fire-and-Forget: High throughput, don’t need result
  • Request-Reply: Need result immediately
  • Pipeline: Complex multi-step workflows
  • Fan-Out/Fan-In: Parallel processing needed
  • DLQ Handler: Need failure recovery
  • Saga: Distributed transactions with rollback
  • Multi-Tenant: SaaS applications
  • Webhook: External system integration
  • Event Replay: Bug fixes, new features
  • Circuit Breaker: External service calls
These patterns cover 90% of production use cases! 🚀✨